 |
|||
|
|
|||
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer import torch model_name = "ryujin-3.5-35b-moe" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
prompt = "Explain the significance of the Dragon God in Shinto mythology." inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
| Benchmark | Ryujin 3.5 (6B active) | LLaMA 3 (8B dense) | GPT-3.5 Turbo | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | 72.4% | 66.5% | 69.8% | | HumanEval (Code) | 68.2% | 62.1% | 64.5% | | Inference Speed (t/s) | 110 t/s | 85 t/s | 90 t/s | | VRAM (4-bit) | 18 GB | 6 GB | N/A (Closed) | ryujin 3.5
Note: The MMLU score is impressive for its active parameter count, rivaling models twice its size. 1. Local Code Generation Because it activates coding-specific experts only when parsing Python or Rust, Ryujin 3.5 avoids "cross-talk" contamination (where math logic interferes with string parsing). This leads to fewer hallucinations in git diff suggestions. 2. Multilingual Routing Ryujin 3.5 dedicates two experts to non-English Latin scripts (Spanish, French, German) and one expert to CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean). For a Japanese prompt ("Ryujin" means Dragon God), the router correctly sends tokens to the CJK expert + the general syntax expert. 3. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) The 256k context window allows you to load a vector database result set directly into the prompt. Ryujin 3.5's sparse attention mechanism pays computational "attention" only to relevant chunks, ignoring filler text. How to Run Ryujin 3.5 (Practical Guide) Assuming this model follows open-source weights (Hugging Face Transformers compatible), here is the optimal setup:
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( model_name, device_map="auto", torch_dtype=torch.float16, load_in_4bit=True # Critical for MoE memory savings ) This leads to fewer hallucinations in git diff suggestions
For developers, the lesson is clear: The era of dense LLMs is sunsetting. Have you run an MoE model locally? How does your experience compare to dense models like LLaMA? Share your benchmarks in the comments below.
Works best with vLLM for production (supports MoE expert parallelism) or llama.cpp (with MoE kernels) for CPU inference. Ryujin 3.5 vs. The Competition | Feature | Ryujin 3.5 | Mixtral 8x7B | DeepSeek-V2 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Active Params | 6B | 12B | 21B | | Total Params | 35B | 47B | 236B | | Expert Count | 16 | 8 | 160 | | Context Window | 256k | 32k | 128k | | License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | MIT | For a Japanese prompt ("Ryujin" means Dragon God),
Note: As of my latest knowledge cutoff, "Ryujin 3.5" is not an official release from major AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral). However, given naming conventions in the open-source community (often inspired by Japanese mythology: Ryujin = Dragon God), this post is written as a forward-looking or speculative analysis of what such a model would represent, particularly in the context of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture and efficiency-focused LLMs. In the rapidly evolving world of Large Language Models (LLMs), bigger isn't always better. While tech giants battle over万亿-parameter monsters, a new class of "surgical" models is emerging. Enter Ryujin 3.5 —a hypothetical but highly plausible next step in efficient, Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture.