Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a textbook of geology, but it is a textbook of methodology.” He argued that the repeated Qur’anic injunctions to “travel through the earth” (29:20), “contemplate the heavens” (3:190), and “reflect” ( ta‘aqqul ) are not poetic ornaments. They are . To practice science is, in a profound sense, to obey the Qur’an.
On the other hand, secularized Muslims and Western orientalists claimed that the Qur’an had nothing to say about nature beyond medieval folklore. Against both extremes, Kamal proposed a : a return to the rationalist tradition of falsafa (Islamic philosophy) as embodied by al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Rushd. He believed that the decline of tafsir began when theology ( kalam ) defeated philosophy ( falsafa ). His project was to revive the philosophical reading of revelation. 2. The Qur’an as a “Summons to Reason” (Istiqlal al-‘Aql) Central to Kamal’s scientific tafsir is the concept of Tawhid not merely as a theological formula, but as a cosmic hypothesis . For Kamal, the declaration “There is no god but God” is also a statement about the universe’s intelligibility. Because the universe is the creation of a singular, rational Will, it operates according to consistent laws ( sunan ). This consistency is the precondition for science.
In an age where the Qur’an is often forced onto a Procrustean bed of modern physics or biology—either to “prove” its divinity via a miracle or to be dismissed as mythological—the voice of the Egyptian existentialist philosopher Zakaria Kamal stands as a remarkable, yet largely overlooked, alternative. Kamal did not ask, “Does the Qur’an contain scientific facts?” Instead, he asked a more fundamental question: “How does the Qur’an’s worldview structure the very possibility of science?”
Thus, scientific tafsir, for Kamal, is the act of reading the Ayat al-Takwiniyya (cosmic verses) with the same hermeneutic rigor as the Ayat al-Tashri’iyya (legal verses). Both require ijtihad (independent reasoning). The scientist is the mujtahid of nature. Here is where Kamal departs most radically from mainstream i’jaz writers. He was deeply suspicious of literalism. For example, when the Qur’an describes the heavens as a “roof” (21:32) or the sun setting in a muddy spring (18:86), the i’jaz writer contorts physics to fit the literal. Kamal, drawing on his existentialist training (he was a scholar of Heidegger and Sartre), insisted on symbolic hermeneutics .
Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a textbook of geology, but it is a textbook of methodology.” He argued that the repeated Qur’anic injunctions to “travel through the earth” (29:20), “contemplate the heavens” (3:190), and “reflect” ( ta‘aqqul ) are not poetic ornaments. They are . To practice science is, in a profound sense, to obey the Qur’an.
On the other hand, secularized Muslims and Western orientalists claimed that the Qur’an had nothing to say about nature beyond medieval folklore. Against both extremes, Kamal proposed a : a return to the rationalist tradition of falsafa (Islamic philosophy) as embodied by al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Rushd. He believed that the decline of tafsir began when theology ( kalam ) defeated philosophy ( falsafa ). His project was to revive the philosophical reading of revelation. 2. The Qur’an as a “Summons to Reason” (Istiqlal al-‘Aql) Central to Kamal’s scientific tafsir is the concept of Tawhid not merely as a theological formula, but as a cosmic hypothesis . For Kamal, the declaration “There is no god but God” is also a statement about the universe’s intelligibility. Because the universe is the creation of a singular, rational Will, it operates according to consistent laws ( sunan ). This consistency is the precondition for science. scientific tafsir zakaria kamal
In an age where the Qur’an is often forced onto a Procrustean bed of modern physics or biology—either to “prove” its divinity via a miracle or to be dismissed as mythological—the voice of the Egyptian existentialist philosopher Zakaria Kamal stands as a remarkable, yet largely overlooked, alternative. Kamal did not ask, “Does the Qur’an contain scientific facts?” Instead, he asked a more fundamental question: “How does the Qur’an’s worldview structure the very possibility of science?” Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a
Thus, scientific tafsir, for Kamal, is the act of reading the Ayat al-Takwiniyya (cosmic verses) with the same hermeneutic rigor as the Ayat al-Tashri’iyya (legal verses). Both require ijtihad (independent reasoning). The scientist is the mujtahid of nature. Here is where Kamal departs most radically from mainstream i’jaz writers. He was deeply suspicious of literalism. For example, when the Qur’an describes the heavens as a “roof” (21:32) or the sun setting in a muddy spring (18:86), the i’jaz writer contorts physics to fit the literal. Kamal, drawing on his existentialist training (he was a scholar of Heidegger and Sartre), insisted on symbolic hermeneutics . On the other hand, secularized Muslims and Western